Legal Opinion

Wickersham v. Wickersham

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1903No. S.F. Nos. 2783, 2784PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Sonoma County confirming a sale made by executors under the will of a deceased testator. Albert G. Burnett, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

The appeal in each of the above cases is from a probate order in the estate of I. G. Wickersham, deceased, confirming a sale made by the executors under a power of sale in the will of the deceased. The two appeals involve the same questions; they were submitted on the same arguments; and they will both be determined in this opinion.

The deceased, I. G. Wickersham, who died testate, left a surviving widow, Lydia C. Wickersham, who afterwards died, and, among other children, a son, Frank P. Wickersham, who also died subsequently to the death of his mother, Lydia. Lydia left a will, to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sharp v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. King v. LagrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Bunner v. StormNew York Court of Chancery · 1844

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mains v. City Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Da Roza v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. In Re Estate of KappenmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Mains v. City Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API