Legal Opinion

Yazbek v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & Bonds

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 20, 1996No. 94-P-1331PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These cases arise from motor vehicle collisions that occurred in 1992 and resulted in the imposition of merit rating surcharges on two of the insured owners of the vehicles by their insurers under G. L. c. 175, § 113B. The insureds appealed, pursuant to G. L. c. 175, § 113P, to the Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies and Bonds (“board”) which upheld the surcharges after hearings. See 211 Code Mass. Regs. § 88.03 (1986).2 Both insureds filed complaints for judicial review under G. L. c. 30A, § 14. In two substantially identical rulings, the cases were remanded to the board by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Embers of Salisbury, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. DiLoreto v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Goddu's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Lapinsky's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nercessian v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. Prescott v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Beck v. People's Service Insurance Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  4. Goggin v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
  5. Cordaville Associates, LLC v. Architectural Access BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API