Legal Opinion

Lapinsky's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 9, 1949PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The question for decision in this case is whether the reviewing board erred in concluding that the *14employee’s death did not arise out of and in the course of his employment.

The facts may be summarized as follows: The employer is engaged in the business of manufacturing bituminous concrete. A portion of its plant consists of four large silos, arranged in line, the tops of which are about fifty feet from the ground. These silos, which are numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4, store materials used in the manufacture of concrete, silo 1 containing sand, and silos 2, 3, and 4 containing various sizes of stone.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Commonwealth v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Thomes v. Meyer Store Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Di Clavio's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. In the Matter of KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Foster v. City of EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Khachadoorian's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Toomey v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API