Legal Opinion

Prescott v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & Bonds

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 10, 1997No. 95-P-1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

After an automobile accident, Rosemarie Prescott’s insurer, Middlesex Insurance Company, sent her a surcharge notice stating that it had determined that she was more than fifty percent at fault in the accident, and that, as a consequence, her automobile insurance premium would be increased on her next renewal. The Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies and Bonds (board) upheld the surcharge, but on Prescott’s appeal under G. L. c. 175, § 113P, a Superior Court judge determined that the board’s decision was “unsupported by substantial evidence.” G. L. c. 30A, § 14. We affirm.

1.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DiLoreto v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Yazbek v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nercessian v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. Fowler v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  3. Goggin v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
  4. Kelley v. HodgsonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
  5. Sutton v. Premier InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API