Legal Opinion

Cordaville Associates, LLC v. Architectural Access Board

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided July 26, 2006No. 050266DCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Wexler, James H., J.

The plaintiff, Cordaville Associates, LLC (“Cordaville”), brought this action pursuant to G.L.c. 30A, §14, appealing the decision of defendant, Architectural Access Board (“Board”), denying Cordaville’s application for a variance from the requirement set forth in 521 Code of Mass. Regs. §21.2 and requiring Cordaville to install five additional curb cuts in sidewalks constructed in connection with two abutting commercial properties owned by Cordaville. Pursuant to Superior Court Standing Order 1-96 and Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(c), Cordaville moves for judgment on the pleadings on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Flint v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. Lisbon v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API