Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. G. M. Gustafson Co. v. Crookston Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1946No. 34,177PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff is the owner of about 18 percent of the stock of defendant trust company, which we were informed on the argument had become subsequent to decision below a national bank. By this proceeding in mandamus, plaintiff seeks to compel defendant to permit it as a stockholder to examine defendant’s books and records for the purposes, as plaintiff alleges, “of ascertaining the true value of plaintiff’s stock” and “of informing plaintiff as to the manner in which affairs of said trust company [defendant] have been and now are being conducted.”

In its answer, defendant…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Merchants Exchange v. KnottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. St. Paul Book & Stationery Co. v. St. Paul Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. Tucson Gas & Electric Company v. SchantzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Rosentool v. Bonanza Oil and Mine Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State Ex Rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. MeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API