Legal Opinion

Tucson Gas & Electric Company v. Schantz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 6, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 336PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in the Superior Court of Pima County, granting the appellee a peremptory writ of mandamus directed to the appellants, ordering them to produce for inspection and copying the proxies held and the ballots cast in the election of the board of directors at the annual meeting of shareholders of Tucson Gas & Electric Company held on May 11, 1966, in Tucson, Arizona.

The mandamus relief had been sought by the appellee in a suit instituted for that purpose. The suit was grounded upon the theory that the appellee, for a proper purpose, was entitled…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Saala v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Gray v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Brown v. Transcon LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. House v. Estate of EdmondsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax AppealsArizona Supreme Court · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API