Rosentool v. Bonanza Oil and Mine Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
(Pro Tempore)
Plaintiff, Samuel Eosentool, became a stockholder in defendant, an Oregon corporation, in 1954. On April 29 and on April 30, 1957, plaintiff served written demand on defendant that he be permitted to examine the-list of shareholders- of defendant corporation and to copy such list. Plaintiff’s demand was rejected, and thereafter, on June 14, 1957, plaintiff commenced this mandamus proceeding to enforce his right to inspect and copy the list of shareholders, which plaintiff claimed is granted him by ORS 57.246. The purpose for tiie inspection of the list stated by plaintiff, both…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Morris v. Broadview, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Union Pacific Railroad v. BeanOregon Supreme Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. NielsenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Campbell v. Ford Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Rainier School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Meyer v. Ford Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Cooke v. OutlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.