Jack Healey Linen Service Co. v. Travis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
McINERNEY, Justice.
In this appeal the sole contention presented for reversal is the trial judge’s error in failing to direct a verdict against the plaintiff who sought damages for bodily injury from a fall sustained on defendant’s premises. The basis of defendant’s argument is that the evidence viewed in its entirety does not show a violation or neglect of any duty owing" to plaintiff.
Plaintiff originally brought her claim for this injury before the State Industrial Court. That tribunal denied her an award based on its finding that the accidental injury for which compensation was sought did…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beatty v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Henryetta Construction Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- JC Penney Company v. BarrientezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- JJ Newberry Company v. LancasterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Towery Ex Rel. Towery v. GuffeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Brown v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan MinistrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Nicholson v. TackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Rogers v. HennesseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.