Legal Opinion

JJ Newberry Company v. Lancaster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1964No. 40196PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against the defendants, in an action brought by plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as the result of defendants’ negligence. The factual background, necessary to understanding of the issues presented on appeal, is fairly reflected by the following summation of evidentiary matters.

The corporate defendant, a national chain retail concern, operated a store in Okmulgee, of which defendant Burleson was local manager at all times pertinent herein. Among other merchandise offered for sale in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Pratt v. WomackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. M & P Stores, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Jack Healey Linen Service Co. v. TravisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Fletcher v. Meadow Gold CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Chisholm v. JR SIMPLOT COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. CR Anthony Company v. MillionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API