Legal Opinion
Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan Ministry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 16, 1997No. 89540PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
¶ 1 We are asked to decide today whether the evidentiary material tendered by TMM and Architect to support the trial court’s summary judgment in their favor provides undisputed proof of the open and obvious character of the premises’ condition, which will support but a single inference that favors nonliability. We answer in the affirmative.
¶ 2 Eric Pickens (Pickens) sued Tulsa Metropolitan Ministry (TMM), an Oklahoma Corporation, the owner of The Tulsa Day Center for the Homeless (the Day Center), a day center and nighttime shelter for the homeless in Tulsa, alleging that TMM…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Swickey v. Silvey CompaniesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.