Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1965No. 40732PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Chief Justice.

This action was instituted by Wanda Beatty, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against her parents, O. L. Dixon and Mrs. O. L. Dixon, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when the plaintiff slipped and fell down in the back doorway of the defendants’ home. At the conclusion of all the testimony and evidence offered by the plaintiff, the trial court sustained defendants’ demurrers to the evidence and judgment was entered that plaintiff take nothing.

Plaintiff contends that the evidence was sufficient to establish a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Pruitt v. TimmeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Jackson v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Clinkscales v. MundkoskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Brown v. Alliance Real Estate GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Nicholson v. TackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Buck v. Del City Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Rogers v. HennesseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Scott v. Archon Group, L.P.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API