Legal Opinion
Hedlund v. Hedlund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 1985No. C7-85-130PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing with prejudice the defendant’s third party complaint for failure to state a claim. The court determined that no facts were in dispute and that the third party defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.
FACTS
As the trial court found, the material facts of this case are not in dispute. In June 1981 the defendant, Louis Hedlund, purchased from the third-party defendant, Torborg Implement, a used International Harvester Super-M tractor which had been manufactured sometime in the 1950’s. Hedlund had been a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Kroeger v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westbrock v. Marshalltown Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Louwagie v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. UrieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986