Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for both defendants.
This personal injury action by plaintiff, a railroad employee, is brought against defendant Heilman, a motorist, on the theory of common-law negligence and against defendant railroad, Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, for negligence under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (35 Stat. 65, as amended, 45 USCA, § 51).
Defendant railroad, herein called the Rock Island, is engaged in interstate commerce and owns and maintains a double-deck drawbridge spanning the Mississippi River near Inver Grove, Minnesota.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rea v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Russell v. German Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Aanenson v. BastienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Kroeger v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.