Legal Opinion

Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1959No. 37,562PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for both defendants.

This personal injury action by plaintiff, a railroad employee, is brought against defendant Heilman, a motorist, on the theory of common-law negligence and against defendant railroad, Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, for negligence under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (35 Stat. 65, as amended, 45 USCA, § 51).

Defendant railroad, herein called the Rock Island, is engaged in interstate commerce and owns and maintains a double-deck drawbridge spanning the Mississippi River near Inver Grove, Minnesota.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Rea v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Russell v. German Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Aanenson v. BastienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kroeger v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API