City & County of San Francisco v. Flood
California Supreme Court
Applal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This action was brought to recover of the defendant, as the surviving partner of Flood & O’Brien, certain State and city and county taxes on personal property, claimed to be delinquent and unpaid for the fiscal year 1876—77. There was judgment for plaintiff, and motion for new trial by defendant, which motion was denied, and the appeal is prosecuted by defendant from the judgment and order denying the motion just mentioned.
The assessment was for “ mining stock,” and its value is inserted in the assessment roll or assessment book (such is the term used in the statute, Pol. Code, § 3650), as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- People v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Falkner, Bell & Co. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- City & County of San Francisco v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Los Angeles v. Board of Equalization of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Stroh v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.