Legal Opinion

Stroh v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1902No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Certiorari to Wayne; Frazer, Carpenter, Donovan, Rohnert, Brooke, and Hosmer (dissenting), JJ. Mandamus by Julius Stroh against the city of- Detroit and the common council of said city to compel the vacation of a tax assessment. From an order granting the writ, respondents bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The Stroh Brewery Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of West Virginia. All but one of its stockholders reside in Detroit, where its principal place of business is located, and where all of its property is situated and assessed for taxes. The authorities having assessed the relator for the value of his shares of stock in said corporation for city taxes for the year 1902, the circuit court ordered this assessment vacated, and the city has removed the case to this court by certiorari.

The Constitution of this State requires that there be a uniform rule of taxation, and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Van Allen v. AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Tennessee v. WhitworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People ex rel. Burke v. BadlamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Montgomery v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Union Trust Co. v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Judy v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API