Legal Opinion
Richardson v. James Gibbons Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 26, 1942No. 4964PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
This was a civil action instituted b’y Wilson Richardson (hereinafter called Richardson) as plaintiff, against The James Gibbons Company (hereinafter called Gibbons) as defendant, for alleged overtime compensation, for liquidated damages, and also for a reasonable attorney’s fee. These claims were all based on the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, Act of June 25, 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
*628The District Judge sustained a motion of the defendant Gibbons to dismiss the action, holding that Richardson was not within the scope of the Fair Labor…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Hart v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Hart v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Southland Gasoline Co. v. BayleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. KeenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Walling v. Mutual Wholesale Food & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Hutchinson v. William C. Barry, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.