Legal Opinion
Katobimar Realty Co. v. Webster
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 12, 1955PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hbhek, J.
At issue here is the legal sufficiency of an amendment to the zoning ordinance of the Borough of New Providence providing that “No lands or structures shall be used, nor shall any structures be erected, altered or used within the Industrial Zone” delineated by the ordinance “for any residential, or retail commercial purpose,” and “Only industrial uses which are not detrimental to health, safety or property shall be permitted, and in no event” shall *119leave be given to conduct storage yards for oil, coal, lumber, junk, certain “noxious and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Corthouts v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
3Cited by53 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Caviglia v. Royal Tours of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- So. Burl. Cty. NAACP v. Tp. of Mt. LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.