Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Chicago Brake & Manufacturing Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided March 7, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GROSSCUP, District Judge.
The bill in this case is to compel the defendant II. S. Park and his assignees to specifically perform his written contract to convey to the complainant his interest in letters patent Nos. 554,086, 543,102, 555,877, and 573,790, issued by the United States, either to Park or to his assignees. The agreement relied upon by the complainant is evidenced by two written papers, one being an assignment, both of which were executed by Park in connection with the sale by him to the complainant of 13 patents relating to railway brakes; and also of four applications already…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Aspinwall, Manuf'g Co. v. GillUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
- Morse Twist Drill & Machine Co. v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Hulse v. Bonsack Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1895
- Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. New York Air-Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. H. B. Chalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Wege v. Safe-Cabinet Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Foreman's Systems, Inc. v. Milk Dealers' Crate Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Miller Saw-Trimmer Co. v. CheshireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.