Legal Opinion

Vanzant v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 3, 2008No. Civil Action 03-1774 (RMU)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Robert Vanzant, alleges that his supervisor, defendant James Schreck, intentionally struck him on the head during a meeting during which the defendant hollered, cursed and behaved belligerently towards him. Schreck characterizes the contact as a jocular tap on the back of the head. The plaintiff holds their mutual employer, defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. Arrington, Derreck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. Coastal International Security, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Cole v. Boeing Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Bilal-Edwards v. United Planning OrganizationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Odutola v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API