Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 15, 2011No. Civil Action 10-0148 (JEB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Doe worked as a scientist for Research Support Instruments (“RSI”), a subsidiary of government contractor Physical Sciences, Inc. (“PSI”). During the course of an experiment, he alleges, he was exposed to the pathogen causing Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, commonly known as “mad-cow disease.” As a result, Plaintiff brings this pro se action against RSI, PSI, and the United States seeking $15 million in damages for negligence, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, strict liability, and Constitutional…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lockhart v. Coastal International Security, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Khatib v. Alliance Bankshares Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Arias v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Abdelhady v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Abdelhady v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.