Legal Opinion

Cole v. Boeing Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 1, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1494PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Deborah R. Cole complains that The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) discriminated against her on the basis of sex, retaliated when she complained, and imposed a hostile work environment. Boeing moves to dismiss, arguing that the District of Co lumbia Human Rights Act does not cover acts that occurred in the Commonwealth of Virginia and that Ms. Cole has failed to state a claim with respect to those acts that occurred in the District. The Court will grant in part and deny in part Boeing’s motion.

I. FACTS

Ms. Cole has filed a 418-paragraph Complaint…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Golden v. Mgmt. & Training Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Leftwich v. Gallaudet UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Conn v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Boykin v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. John Doe I v. Exxon Mobil CorpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API