Legal Opinion
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 5, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) adopting in part and rejecting in part the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) regarding the general assessments for its fiscal years 1997-1998, 1998-1999 and 1999-2000.
Pursuant to Section 510(a) of the Public Utility Code (Code), 66 Pa.C.S. § 510(a), all public utilities in Pennsylvania, including UPS, are required to pay assessments levied by the PUC to cover the PUC’s estimated costs of administering the Code. The PUC’s assessment methodology is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Robson v. BIESTERCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kapres v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- MacElree v. Chester CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mercury Trucking, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Cave v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003