United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentChief Justice Cappy
In my view, the majority decides this appeal on issues that the appellant, United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), did not raise, and grants UPS relief that UPS did not request. I must, therefore, respectfully dissent.
This appeal arises out of the Application to Enforce Unappealed Final Decision (“Application to Enforce”) that UPS filed in the Commonwealth Court. In the Application to Enforce, UPS asserted that the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) failed to comply with the Commonwealth *318Court’s prior order in United Parcel Service, Inc. v. PUC, 789 A.2d 353 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001) (“UPS…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Danville Area School District v. Danville Area Education Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001