Legal Opinion

Kapres v. Heller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1994No. 0014 Western District, Appeal Docket 1993PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The question before the Court is whether a minor can be held liable under the social host doctrine for furnishing alcohol to another minor, who is subsequently injured as the proximate result of his intoxicated condition. For the reasons that follow we find no basis for liability between minors under the social host doctrine.1

*554On March 21,1986 the plaintiff, a student at Clarion University, attended three parties in Clarion, Pennsylvania hosted by the minor defendants. At one of the parties the plaintiff was required to pay for admission. He consumed alcohol…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Fassett v. Delta Kappa EpsilonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Pennsylvania State University v. County of CentreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Reeder v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Campo v. St. Luke's HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. L.J.S. v. State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Welc v. PorterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API