Legal Opinion

United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 2003No. M-00981098, M-00981119, & M-00991293PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

In the proceeding under review, United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) sought enforcement by the Commonwealth Court of the court’s previous decision sustaining the carrier’s challenge to one aspect of the methodology utilized by the Public Utility Commission (the “PUC” or the “Commission”) in allocating the agency’s regulatory expenses among utilities for assessment purposes as provided by statute. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the Commonwealth Court’s order pertaining to the enforcement phase of the proceedings.

As a national motor carrier of property, certain of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Riedel v. HUMAN REL. COM'N OF READINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. Tick, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Pierro v. PierroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Haefele v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. American Future Systems, Inc. v. Better Business BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Mercury Trucking, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. ProettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API