Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint Concerning Kirby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1984No. C8-83-1718, C8-83-150PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The above-entitled matter came before this court upon orders to show cause why each of the above named judges should not be suspended with pay pending final determination by this court upon recommendations by the Board on Judicial Standards (hereafter Board) that each judge should be removed from office. Minnesota Statute 490.16, subdivision 1 (1982) provides as follows:

Subdivision 1. A judge is disqualified from acting as a judge, without loss of salary, while there is pending an indictment or any information charging him with a crime punishable as a felony under Minnesota or federal…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Hon. Charles E. KadingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. In Re Disbarment of John D. GreathouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. State v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kendall v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. In the Matter of FergusonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Matter of GrubbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re Complaint Against JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Conduct of GinsbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API