Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 8, 1981No. 121PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

Defendant has abandoned his first and second assignments of error. By his third assignment, he contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the state’s objections to defense counsel’s questions of witness Eastman concerning the name of the confidential informer used by the state, and the nature of the reward given to the informer. We find no merit in this assignment.

SBI Agent Redding W. Leggett was the first witness presented by the state. On direct examination, he testified, among other things, that he went to the F&W Foodmart on the day in question, encountered defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Simeon Jessamy CokeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. BolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Paris v. MICHAEL KREITZ JR., PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. JerniganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API