Legal Opinion

State v. Leazer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 29, 1994No. 398A93PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendants first assign as error the trial court’s decision admitting, over objection, a videotape of the crime scene including the removal of the body from the scene. The defendant relies upon North Carolina Rules of Evidence, Rules 401 and 403 in arguing that the videotape was irrelevant, inflammatory and that its probative value was greatly outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rules 401 and 403 (1992); see State v. Hennis, 323 N.C. 279, 372 S.E.2d 523 (1988).

The videotape in question was approximately six minutes in length; however, the objection…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. CornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. KandiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. MacK v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API