Legal Opinion
Transfresh Corp. v. Ganzerla & Assoc., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 23, 2012No. C-11-06348 JCSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6) [Docket No. 10]
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff TransFresh Corp. (“Trans-Fresh”) brings this action for injunctive relief and other remedies under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., and under California state law based on alleged false advertising and unfair competition on the part of Defendant PeakFresh USA (“PeakFresh”) in connection with statements and a video posted on PeakFresh’s website. According to TransFresh, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alterg, Inc. v. Boost Treadmills LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Okeke v. Biomat USA, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- LT International Ltd. v. Shuffle Master, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2014
- Baum v. J-B Weld Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Clear Connection Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.