Legal Opinion
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 3, 1987No. 188PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of that portion of the court’s opinion dated November 20, 1986, 11 Cl.Ct. 221, which dismissed from docket 188 plaintiffs’ White Earth allotment claim. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
In its November 20, 1986 opinion the court considered eight motions for summary judgment filed by the parties in docket numbers 19, 188, and 189-A.1 Among them was defendant’s motion with respect to plaintiffs’ claim that land allotted to them on the White Earth Reservation was forestry…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- The Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians, on Its Own Behalf, and on Relation of the Skykomish Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Otoe and Missouria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- United States v. Seminole NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Pueblo of Santo Domingo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.