Legal Opinion

The Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians, on Its Own Behalf, and on Relation of the Skykomish Tribe of Indians v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 17, 1967No. 7-65PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARAMORE, Judge.

In January 1951, the appellant Sno-qualmie Tribe of Indians filed a timely petition with the Indian Claims Commission alleging that it was a party to the Treaty of Point Elliott in 1855 and that under that Treaty it ceded to the United States for an unconscionable consideration a designated part of the total area described in the Treaty. Treaty with the Dwamish &c. Indians, January 22, 1855, ratified March 8,1859,12 Stat. 927. Jurisdiction was predicated on and recovery sought under section 2 of the Indian Claims Commission Act of 1946. 60 Stat. 1049, 25 U.S.C. § 70a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Seminole NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Spokane Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Peoria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Jerome Rosenberg v. Raymond v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API