Legal Opinion

Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 23, 1987No. Nos. 19, 189-APublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pursuant to the order of November 25, 1987, as amended, trial is set to commence April 4,1988 on certain claims presented in docket number 189-A. Generally stated, that docket relates to an accounting by defendant of Red Lake Band trust funds. It is part of a larger complex of claims presented in these consolidated cases, all arising under the Indian Claims Commission Act, Pub.L. No. 79-726, 60 Stat. 1049, 25 U.S.C. §§ 70a-70v-2 (1976). Most of the issues raised by the Red Lake Band have counterparts in the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe docket numbers. In hopes of using a…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Seminole Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cobell v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  2. Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API