Legal Opinion

Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 18, 1989No. 326-APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This matter, presently pending before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ water claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Claims Court (RUSCC), is yet another chapter in a long, complex proceeding spanning thirty-eight years. The dispute centers upon whether plaintiff’s water claims, presented explicitly by plaintiffs for the first time in their supplemental and amended exceptions filed on June 10, 1982, fall within the scope of plaintiffs’ original petition. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. The Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians, on Its Own Behalf, and on Relation of the Skykomish Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Catawba Indian Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API