Pueblo of Santo Domingo v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
Plaintiff, Pueblo of Santo Domingo, moves the court to amend a 1969 stipulation and map setting forth defendant’s liability for extinguishing plaintiff’s aboriginal title to certain lands. Defendant contends this court can not entertain plaintiff’s motion because it is untimely and jurisdictionally barred pursuant to section 12 of the Indian Claims Commission Act. For the reasons stated hereinafter, plaintiff’s motion is denied.
Factual Background
Plaintiff's "Motion to Amend Map of Aboriginal Area, and 1969 stipulation as to Standing to Sue, Liability and Area,” now before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians, on Its Own Behalf, and on Relation of the Skykomish Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United States v. Pueblo of San IldefonsoUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Pueblo of Santo Domingo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. Gretchen WhitmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009