Legal Opinion
United States v. Newman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2011No. 10-10430, 10-10431, 10-10444PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants David Ray Newman and Jon Tedesco committed crimes that subject them to criminal forfeiture: Newman robbed two banks, and Tedesco conspired to defraud banks. Defendants each pleaded guilty and agreed to forfeit a specific amount of money. The district court nevertheless eliminated criminal forfeiture or reduced it to a trivial amount. The government timely appeals. Because the district court’s reasoning in the two cases is substantially similar, we issue this joint opinion.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Newman
Newman robbed a bank and stole $1,152. The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Mark PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Henry LoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Gerald GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Gregory BaneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.