Legal Opinion
United States v. Terry Christensen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2016No. 08-50531; 08-50570; 09-50115; 09-50125; 09-50128; 09-50159; 10-50434; 10-50462; 10-50464; 10-50472PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Chief District Judge CHRISTENSEN
ORDER
The opinion filed August 25, 2015 is hereby amended as follows: The last paragraph on page 41 through the last paragraph on page 43 of the slip opinion should be removed and replaced with the following:
The main theory of Kachikian’s defense was that Kachikian lacked the required criminal intent because he believed Pellicano was using his Telesleuth software for lawful purposes. The court instructed the jury that the government had to prove that “the defendant acted intentionally, that is, purposefully and…
2Cases cited130 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- United States v. Anthony EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. PonzoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- United States v. Henry LoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Steven DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.