Legal Opinion
United States v. Henry Lo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 2016No. 15-10219PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Henry Lo appeals the district court’s imposition of a restitution order and a forfeiture money judgment, both in the amount of $2,232,894, as part of his sentence for three counts of wire fraud and mail fraud to which he pleaded guilty. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because Lo validly waived his right to appeal, and none of the exceptions to such waivers are applicable, we dismiss this appeal.
I
On August 19, 2014, Henry Lo was indicted in district court for two different schemes to…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Michael Nguyen, AKA Viet Quoc NguyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Pascual Dionicio JeronimoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Joseph LoftisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Benjamin KoziolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Jonathan WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.