Legal Opinion
United States v. Warshak
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 14, 2010No. 08-3997, 08-4085, 08-4087, 08-4212, 08-4429, 09-3176PublishedCited by 285 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoggs, J., joined by McKEAGUE, J.,
KEITH, J. (pp. 333-36), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the result.
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, Inc., was an incredibly profitable company that served as the distributor of Enzyte, an herbal supplement purported to enhance male sexual performance. In this appeal, defendants Steven Warshak (“Warshak”), Harriet Warshak (“Harriet”), and TCI Media, Inc. (“TCI”), challenge their convictions stemming from a massive scheme to defraud Berkeley’s customers. Warshak and Harriet also challenge their sentences, as well as two forfeiture judgments.
Given the…
2Cases cited159 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by285 opinions
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Schuchardt v. President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Kerns v. BaderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- In re the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance & Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
280 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.