Legal Opinion

Vancamp v. Burgner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1990No. 8915SC523Published

1Opinion of the Court

392 S.E.2d 453 (1990)

99 N.C. App. 102

Betsy VANCAMP, Plaintiff,

v.

Wanda Carter BURGNER, Samuel Richard Burgner, Defendants.

No. 8915SC523.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 19, 1990.

Blackwell & Lapping by Jeff Blackwell, Wilmington, for plaintiff-appellant.

Babb and Barr by Billy R. Barr, Winston-Salem, for defendants-appellees.

JOHNSON, Judge.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in deciding that the doctrine of last clear chance was inapplicable as a matter of law to the facts of the case. We find that the evidence required submitting the issue of last clear…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Watson v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Sink v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Schaefer v. WicksteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Vancamp v. BurgnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API