Legal Opinion

Sink v. Sumrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1979No. 7810SC633PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the dismissal of the case at the close of his evidence. The appeal raises three questions for review: negligence of defendant Sumrell, contributory negligence of plaintiff’s intestate and the doctrine of last clear chance. As to each of these principles of law, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Homes, Inc. v. Bryson, 273 N.C. 84, 159 S.E. 2d 329 (1968).

The trial court based its decision to dismiss the case on Battle v. Chavis, 266 N.C. 778, 147 S.E. 2d 387 (1966), and Barnes v. Horney, 247 N.C. 495,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Smith v. RawlinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wray v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Nickell v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Proffitt v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Vancamp v. BurgnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Grogan v. MILLER BREWING CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API