Legal Opinion

Watson v. White

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1983No. 53A83PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Defendants contend that, on the facts in the record before us, the Court of Appeals erred in holding that plaintiff was entitled to an instruction on the issue of last clear chance. 1 Defendants argue that the source of the error lies in a misstatement of the law of last clear chance. The Court of Appeals enunciated the law as follows:

The elements of the doctrine of last clear chance are the following: (1) plaintiff, by his own negligence, placed himself in a position of peril (or a position of peril to which he was inadvertent); (2) defendant saw, or by the exercise of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Clodfelter v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Scallon v. HooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Outlaw v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Rodriguez v. TraylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API