Legal Opinion

Vancamp v. Burgner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1990No. 8915SC523PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in deciding that the doctrine of last clear chance was inapplicable as a matter of law to the facts of the case. We find that the evidence required submitting the issue of last clear chance to the jury and the trial court erred in directing a verdict for defendants.

The plaintiff must prove the following four elements to be entitled to a jury instruction on last clear chance:(1) the pedestrian, by his own negligence, placed himself in a position of helpless peril, (2) the defendant was aware of, or by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Watson v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Sink v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Schaefer v. WicksteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vancamp v. BurgnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Culler v. HamlettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Griffith v. McCallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Womack v. StephensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Dixon v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API