Legal Opinion

Sharpe v. St. Luke's Hospital

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 2003No. 36 MAP 2001PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUSTICE SAYLOR.

We allowed appeal in this matter to determine whether a hospital, which collects samples for drug testing under a contract with an employer, owes a duty of care to the employee undergoing that testing.

Appellant Renee Sharpe (“Sharpe”), a courier for Federal Express, was directed to report to St. Luke’s Hospital (the “Hospital”) to undergo routine, random drug screening. Pursuant to a contract with Federal Express, the Hospital collected urine samples and then forwarded those samples to an outside laboratory for testing. On the day in question, Sharpe maintains, numerous…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural StudioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Landon v. Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Mission Petroleum Carriers, Inc. v. SolomonTexas Supreme Court · 2003

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API