SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Doe
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHecht, Justice
in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, CORNYN, ENOCH and OWEN, Justices, joined.
Increasingly within the past decade, the policy of employers in this country has been to screen employees and prospective employees for drug usage. Employers frequently retain independent laboratories to perform drug screening tests. This case requires us to begin to define these laboratories’ legal responsibility to persons tested.
Plaintiffs pre-employment drug test revealed the presence of opiates in her urine, and as a result her job offer was withdrawn. Her complaint is not that the test was performed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by254 opinions
- Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Via Net v. TIG Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- In Re International Profit Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.