Woodman v. Innes
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sedgwick District Court. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for defendants, Ross and others, April 7, 1888. The plaintiffs, Woodman and others, bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The material facts of this case are as follows : The firms of Innes & Ross and Aldrich & Brown, in 1882, owned property and were engaged in business on Main street, in the city of Wichita, in this state, near the building where the post office in Wichita was kept. They were desirous of having the post office remain in the building near their place of business, and, as an inducement to have the post office remain in the building, on the 1st of October, 1882, they executed and delivered to W. C. Woodman their written contract, whereby they…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- St. Joseph & Denver City Rld. v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Elkhart County Lodge v. CraryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Beal v. PolhemusMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wittenberg v. MollyneauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Peckham v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Hare v. PhaupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- State ex rel. Morgan v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.