Hare v. Phaup
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Probate Court, Pottawatomie County; W. N. Maben, Trial Judge. Action by Alfred Hare against T. M. Phaup. Judgment for defendant, ■ and plaintiff brings error. cited : Woodman v. Innes, 47 Kan. 26; Elhhari County Lodge v. Crary, 98 Ind. 238; Filson v. Iiimes, 5 Pa. 452; Meguire v. Corwine, 101 H. S. 108; Tool Company v. Norris, 2 Wall. 45; Wilson’s Eev. & Ann. St. § 813.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This cause comes to this court on a transcript of the record containing the bill of particulars, demurrer, and judgment rendered thereon in the probate court of Pottawatomie county. The bill of particulars filed in the cause declared upon the following contract:
“Be it remembered that for and in consideration of the ser vices of and expenses incurred by Alfred Hare in procuring the establishment of the United States post office of the city of Tecumseh, O. T., in and upon the west side of block 52 of said city, I hereby promise to pay to the said Alfred Hare the sum of $5 per month, monthly in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Meguire v. CorwineSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Elkhart County Lodge v. CraryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Beal v. PolhemusMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. Board of Com'rs of Choctaw CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Molacek v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- C. L. McMahon Jr. v. Caribbean Mills, Inc., a Haitian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Davis v. JanewaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Chambers v. CoatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.