Legal Opinion

Beal v. Polhemus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1887PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Newton, J., presiding.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiffs brought suit in the circuit court for the county of Washtenaw upon the following contract :

“8600. Ann Arbor, Mich., December 31,1881.
“ On or before the thirty-first day of December, 1883, for value received, I promise to pay to Rice A. Beal, or bearer, six hundred dollars.
*131“This note is given on condition that said Bice A. Beal,, his heirs or assigns, shall erect a building on the north-east corner of Ann and Main streets on block two, north of Huron street, in the city of Ann Arbor, and that said building shall, on or before the thirty-first day of December, 1883, be occupied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Hays v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Cole v. Brown-Hurley Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Mahoney v. Lincoln Brick Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API