Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Woda

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 2000No. 96-11475; CA A101658PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*75LANDAU, P. J.

At issue in this case is whether claimant’s respiratory condition — a sudden allergic reaction to wood dust at work — must be analyzed as a claim for an occupational disease or as an occupational injury. Different burdens of proof pertain to occupational diseases and occupational injuries, so the distinction is significant. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) concluded that the condition was properly analyzed as an occupational injury, because it consisted of an event that occurred suddenly in reaction to exposure to the dust. Employer seeks review of the Board’s decision,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mason v. LovelessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  2. Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. SAIF Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Rueda v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Dynea USA, Inc. v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API