Legal Opinion

Gault Lumber Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1913No. 2446PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Oklahoma County Courtj Sam Jlooker, Judge. Action by the Gault Lumber Company against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Ee Railway Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This is an action in replevin to recover possession of certain lumber contained in car No. 13112, initials S. W., of the value of $320.50, and certain other lumber contained, in car No. 70397, initials M. K. & T., of tbe value of $92.91. The cause was tried to the court, without a jury, on an agreed statement of facts (and other evidence.)

The agreed statement reads as follows:

“That the two cars containing the lumber and building material involved in the above entitled cause bear numbers and initials as follows: ‘S. W. No. 13112/ and CM. K. & T. No. 70397/ That ear S. W.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McNeill v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Heyman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. United States v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1908
  5. Inter. Com. Commis'n v. CHICAGO & C. R'D CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garrison Coal Co. v. HindsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API